Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jonathan Ray's avatar

A pigouvian tax* on added sugars and pigouvian subsidy* for fiber in foods and beverages would probably accomplish orders of magnitude more for public health. But people would be mad, and this administration would never do it.

* not in the sense of classical externalities, but in the sense of people's hyperbolic-discounting, marshmellow-test-failing monkey brains making decisions that impose costs on their future selves who effectively didn't get to participate in the decision.

Expand full comment
Brian Banks's avatar

Why don’t you do all cause mortality rather than cardiovascular events? Data I have seen seems to suggest high LDL has protective effects

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts